Busch IV makes a good point
Why ban someone for betting on their own team if you aren’t going to ban someone for using steroids to break the home run record?
MITCH BLATT
Last week, Busch family member and the son of Cardinals owner (and very properly named for such an aristocrat) Adolphus A. Busch IV criticized Mark McGwire, Bud Selig and the Cardinals organization in an eight-paragraph statement.
I ignored it at the time, but one section sticks out at me for the sheer idiocy of continuing to ban Pete Rose when nearly ever home run leader of the past decade has been a cheater:
“Mark McGwire chose to take performance-enhancing drugs nine of his 18 years in professional baseball,” the statement continued. “He was paid millions while perpetrating a fraud. So how is it MLB Commissioner Bud Selig gives him a pass and welcomes McGwire back to the very game he betrayed?”
Amazing.
Photo: AP
Popularity: 5% [?]
I discovered lots of interesting stuff as part of your blog extremely it’s discourse
Anyone make the idea seem so simple with a presentation however , I find this topic to be really something I think I might never have an understanding of
I’ve said that least 401614 times. The problem this like that is they are just too compilcated for the average bird, if you know what I mean
Blog content is very good and I will come back to read it as an encouragement to the other