<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Juiced Sports Blog*: Writing Enhanced by Flaxseed Oil &#187; SI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://juicedsportsblog.com/category/si/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://juicedsportsblog.com</link>
	<description>Writing Enhanced by Flaxseed Oil</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 22:22:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A comparison of ESPN.com and SI.com headlines</title>
		<link>http://juicedsportsblog.com/2010/02/a-comparison-of-espncom-and-sicom.html</link>
		<comments>http://juicedsportsblog.com/2010/02/a-comparison-of-espncom-and-sicom.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mhblatt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports Illustrated]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juicedsportsblog.com/?p=1713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All the same things, but ESPN uses more exciting verbiage.
MITCH BLATT
While browsing ESPN and SI.com this morning, I noticed ESPN and SI had the same topics for almost all their headlines but ESPN&#8217;s headlines were framed in a much more exciting manner.
For example, how do the two sites headline a story about Dwight Freeney tearing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>All the same things, but ESPN uses more exciting verbiage.</em></p>
<p><strong>MITCH BLATT</strong></p>
<p>While browsing ESPN and SI.com this morning, I noticed ESPN and SI had the same topics for almost all their headlines but ESPN&#8217;s headlines were framed in a much more exciting manner.</p>
<p>For example, how do the two sites headline a story about Dwight Freeney tearing a ligament in his ankle.</p>
<p>ESPN headlines his torn ligament:</p>
<blockquote><p>Source: Freeney has torn ligament in ankle</p></blockquote>
<p>While SI takes the Colts sources and headlines their denial:</p>
<blockquote><p>Colts deny Freeney has ligament tear in ankle<span id="more-1713"></span></p></blockquote>
<p>When it comes to Rex Ryan flipping the bird, ESPN headlines:</p>
<blockquote><p>Jets&#8217; Ryan sorry for flipping fans the bird</p></blockquote>
<p>While SI refers to &#8220;flipping the bird&#8221; simply as an &#8220;obscene gesture.&#8221;</p>
<p>At ESPN, Julius Peppers&#8217; agent is &#8220;<strong>convinced</strong>&#8221; that Peppers will &#8220;leave the Panthers.&#8221;  At SI, it&#8217;s simply a question: &#8220;Peppers done with Panthers?&#8221;</p>
<p>The final analysis shows that 70% of their headlines are about the same topics.<!--more--> Here are the screenshots:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">ESPN</span><br />
<img src="http://media.share.ovi.com/m1/s/1712/da80b68abc15425e9c03f4b331aef26c.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Sports Illustrated</span><br />
<img src="http://media.share.ovi.com/m1/s/1712/b281c00f3baa44b283435a782bfe2ef8.jpg" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://juicedsportsblog.com/2010/02/a-comparison-of-espncom-and-sicom.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

