<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Juiced Sports Blog*: Writing Enhanced by Flaxseed Oil &#187; Cleveland Indians</title>
	<atom:link href="http://juicedsportsblog.com/tag/cleveland-indians/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://juicedsportsblog.com</link>
	<description>Writing Enhanced by Flaxseed Oil</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 22:22:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Marlins are the best team in baseball</title>
		<link>http://juicedsportsblog.com/2009/04/the-marlins-are-the-best-team-in-baseball.html</link>
		<comments>http://juicedsportsblog.com/2009/04/the-marlins-are-the-best-team-in-baseball.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjacobs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best team in baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleveland Indians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Marlins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perfect Marlins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Undefeated start]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Nationals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juicedsportsblog.com/?p=959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s true, they&#8217;re the last undefeated team left in baseball, which quite frankly at 3-0, is kinda sad
SCOTT JACOBS
Just 159 more, just 159 more.  Take it one game at a time would ya guys!  If the Marlins are to go undefeated this season, they&#8217;re the only ones left with an unblemished record, then they might [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>It&#8217;s true, they&#8217;re the last undefeated team left in baseball, which quite frankly at 3-0, is kinda sad</em></p>
<p><strong>SCOTT JACOBS</strong></p>
<p>Just 159 more, just 159 more.  Take it one game at a time would ya guys!  If the Marlins are to go undefeated this season, they&#8217;re the only ones left with an unblemished record, then they might want to schedule the Nationals 140 more times.</p>
<p>Okay seriously, at 3-0 the Marlins are an iceberg in an ocean filled with melting ice.  But their iceberg too will melt, and soon, probably tonight, there will be no one left among baseball&#8217;s undefeated.</p>
<p>It took the Titans a few months before they lost to the Jets.  But baseball teams can&#8217;t even make it unscathed out of the first week.  Think about it, in what other sport is the first week of your season more meaningless?  I&#8217;m waiting.  Still waiting?  Got nothing?  Yeah, me neither.<span id="more-959"></span></p>
<p>For those of you marking the answers down in your program the answer is baseball.  The Marlins could finish this weekend at 6-0, and I don&#8217;t think a single person would look at them differently then when they started the season, with minimal expectations and the lowest payroll in the game.   Why?  Because the season is so damn long that your average sports fan doesn&#8217;t truly get into it until halfway into the year, when there&#8217;s still 81 games left, which is one game less than the NBA plays over it&#8217;s entire regular season!</p>
<p>And while we&#8217;re at it, the Nationals (who the Marlins swept) and the Indians (who also got swept, duh!) are the last two teams who have yet to win.  Come to think of it, it seems like teams lose a lot to start the year, compared to winning a lot.  How many undefeated teams do you see on a yearly basis even into the second week?  Think about it.</p>
<p>Not many.</p>
<p>Most of the time, not any.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://juicedsportsblog.com/2009/04/the-marlins-are-the-best-team-in-baseball.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baseball needs to give away awards much sooner</title>
		<link>http://juicedsportsblog.com/2008/11/breaking-news-cliff-lee-claims-cy-young.html</link>
		<comments>http://juicedsportsblog.com/2008/11/breaking-news-cliff-lee-claims-cy-young.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 20:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjacobs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CY Young]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleveland Indians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cliff Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco 49ers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Lincecum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juicedsportsblog.com/2008/11/breaking-news-cliff-lee-claims-cy-young.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indians go back to back with Lee&#8217;s CY Young
SCOTT JACOBS
Yesterday it was Tim Lincecum.  Today it was Cliff Lee.
And you know what the two had in common?
Few even noticed.  Look, winning the CY Young is a great accomplishment, but two things take the luster off of their achievement.  First off, their teams stinked.  The Indians [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Indians go back to back with Lee&#8217;s CY Young</em></p>
<p><strong>SCOTT JACOBS</strong></p>
<p>Yesterday it was Tim Lincecum.  Today it was Cliff Lee.</p>
<p>And you know what the two had in common?</p>
<p>Few even noticed.  Look, winning the CY Young is a great accomplishment, but two things take the luster off of their achievement.  First off, their teams stinked.  The Indians and Giants were blips on the relevence radar after about a month and a half into the season.  More importantly though, the award is given so late in the year, that it&#8217;s practically forgotten.</p>
<p>I will never understand why baseball hands out its post-season awards two weeks after the World Series.  As you saw this year the Fall Classic had minimal buzz, so why in the world would you hand out your most prestigious award (arguably) after most of the world has already tuned out?  So what to do?  Here&#8217;s my suggestions:</p>
<p>1. Hand out the freaking award during the playoffs.  The NBA may have an incredibly long playoff system in place, but they do have one thing right: they hand out their awards during the heat of the moment.  They crown their best during the best time of their season.  And that&#8217;s what baseball needs to do!  Announce the CY Young winners during the ALCS and NLCS.  Give away the MVP award before game one of the World Series or game two.  DO something, anything, but giving it away two weeks plys after the season has reached it&#8217;s conclusion.</p>
<p>2. If you&#8217;re going to hand out the awards after the season, do it one week after.  Allow it to be fresh in people&#8217;s minds.  Most sports fans have moved on to the NFL, College Football, and the NBA (Sorry hockey), and baseball for now is at the bottom of the totem-pole.  Why?  Because this is when the sports season heats up like no other time of the year.  So don&#8217;t wait for your sport to be forgotten.  Do it when it&#8217;s fresh!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m asking that much here.  I really don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>But baseball has a funny way of doing things differently, so maybe it is fitting that they&#8217;d give out their awards long after everyone has moved on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://juicedsportsblog.com/2008/11/breaking-news-cliff-lee-claims-cy-young.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who cares about next year!</title>
		<link>http://juicedsportsblog.com/2008/07/who-cares-about-next-year.html</link>
		<comments>http://juicedsportsblog.com/2008/07/who-cares-about-next-year.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 01:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sjacobs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CC Sabathia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Cubs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleveland Indians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milwaukee Brewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NL Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NL West]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oakland Athletics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rich Harden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juicedsportsblog.com/2008/07/who-cares-about-next-year.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Rich Harden the prayer Chicago Cubs fans have been looking for?  Is CC Sabathia the savior in Milwaukee?  It&#8217;s going to be one heck of a second half as two tough lucked franchises battle it out with huge expectations on the line  
SCOTT JACOBS
That took a long time.
A day after the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Is Rich Harden the prayer Chicago Cubs fans have been looking for?  Is CC Sabathia the savior in Milwaukee?  It&#8217;s going to be one heck of a second half as two tough lucked franchises battle it out with huge expectations on the line  </em></p>
<p><strong>SCOTT JACOBS</strong></p>
<p>That took a long time.</p>
<p>A day after the Brewers pulled off the &#8220;please get us in the playoffs, it&#8217;s been 25 years, and we want to pee our pants&#8221; trade for CC Sabathia, the Chicago Cubs sat on their heels did nothing for 24 hours, and then completed their own mega-trade, landing Athletics&#8217; pitcher Rich Harden.</p>
<p>In unrelated news, the NBA&#8217;s Western Conference wants their story-lines back.  What&#8217;s next?  The Cardinals bringing Roger Clemens out of retirement?  The Pirates signing Barry Bonds to get them over the .500 mark?</p>
<p>We haven&#8217;t even hit the All Star break, yet the two biggest names to switch jerseys have probably already been etched in leather.</p>
<p>Sabathia.  Harden.  Cubs.  Brewers.</p>
<p>If nothing else, this ought to be fun.<span id="more-529"></span></p>
<p><img src="http://graphics.jsonline.com/graphics/sports/brew/img/jul08/cc0707.jpg" align="right" height="228" hspace="10" vspace="10" width="249" />The Brewers went for broke dealing for Sabathia, the 2007 CY Young award winner.  They dealt some very good prospects to Cleveland for the right to rent the massive pitcher for a few months.  Milwaukee was so desperate that they traded for Sabathia weeks before the trading deadline, just so they could shove a pair of starts in before the All Star break for their newest star. After all, when he leaves at the end of the year the Brewers get a couple draft picks in return.  Hopefully by then, the Brewers will still be celebrating some kind of playoff success.</p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<p>Now onto the Cubs. With their trade for the very talented, but oft-injured Harden, the Cubs have positioned themselves to not only make the playoffs, but to make a deep run.  Chicago is already 17 games above .500, and their 475 runs scored are second only to the Rangers. <strong><font color="#ffff00"><br />
</font></strong><br />
Clearly they can hit.  Now, there&#8217;s little doubt they can pitch.</p>
<p>Adding Harden (5-1, 2.34 ERA in 13 starts) to the mix gives Chicago so many quality arms that they now just might have the best overall rotation in the league.</p>
<p>You decide:</p>
<p>Carlos Zambrano: 9-3, 2.96 ERA<br />
Ryan Dempster: 9-3, 3.24 ERA<br />
Ted Lilly:  9-5, 4.47 ERA<br />
Jason Marquis: 6-5, 4.78 ERA</p>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<h3><strong><font color="#ffff00">The two trades look great on paper.  Then again, so did the Mets. </font></strong></h3>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p>The NL Central was a mediocre fight in 2007 between two very underwhelming teams: the Cubs and the Brewers.  In 2008, barring a St. Louis fade, the Central figures to be an exciting three team race.  Think of the NL Central as last year&#8217;s NL West, and think of the NL West as last year&#8217;s Central.  Basically, the divisions have swapped places.</p>
<p>And nowhere are they happier then in Wisconsin and the Windy City.</p>
<p>Ya know what, I think I like that title.  Sorta catchy, no?</p>
<p>Wisconsin and the Windy City: Part 1, with many more to come.</p>
<p>At least for this year at least.  Because while the Brewers take their rental for a spin this week, Harden is under contract for 2009 and is making a paltry $4.75 million this year.  Sabathia is most likely one and done, expected to command Johan Santana money, and some team (ignoring Santana&#8217;s over bloated contract) will pay it to him.  It just won&#8217;t be the Brewers.</p>
<p>And with Ben Sheets a free agent too, this is Milwaukee&#8217;s window to end 25 years of no playoffs: a half a season.</p>
<p>The Cubs are staring up at a bigger number: 100.  As in, if they don&#8217;t win a World Series this year they hit the grand ol&#8217; century mark for infamy. The Brewers&#8230; well, they&#8217;ve never even won a title.  Though, they did get to the Fall Classic in 1982, incidentally they last time they made the playoffs at all.</p>
<p>Back to the Cubs. Again, it should be pointed out that Harden is no sure thing.  The A&#8217;s loved him when he came up, and he was great&#8211; when healthy.  Which isn&#8217;t often.  Harden&#8217;s made six trips to the DL in six years in the bigs.  Not exactly cute numbers.</p>
<p>But for what Chicago gave up, a disappointing Matt Murton who isn&#8217;t exactly tearing the cover off the baseball in Triple A hitting .250, and a few other prospects, they can afford to take a chance on the talented ace.</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s clear that long term the Cubs are in better shape.  They can re-ink Harden if they so choose after this year or during the 2009 season. Though this does have a familiar tune to it.</p>
<p>After all, the Cubs used to rely on an oft-injured pitcher for years to keep alive their title hopes.  His name was Mark Prior. And how&#8217;d that one work out?</p>
<p>So before you run out and buy World Series hotel reservations Cubs and Brewers fans, know this: this looks great on paper, but it only matters what happens on the field.  Disappointment is possible.  Anything can happen.</p>
<p>Then again, who am I kidding.  Cubs and Brewers fans know that better then anybody!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://juicedsportsblog.com/2008/07/who-cares-about-next-year.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

